|
|
|
|
김정희 ( Kim Jeong-Hee ) - 제주대학교 의학전문대학원 간호학과
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was conducted to identify patterns and trends of studies of SMIs from 1999 to 2004, and to suggest the directions of future research activities.
Method: 38 research studies of SMIs were selected and classified according to the sample characteristics, and the types of SMIs and outcome variables.
Results: The number of SMIs studies has been increased since 1991, but it was more smaller than descriptive
studies. They tended to be conducted more without the conceptual framework or randomization. Nurses were the most popular subjects and GHQ was more prevalent than other instruments. SMIs studies used confusedly in “job stress” terms. The outcome variables, most frequently measured were “anxiety and depression”. 46 interventions were conducted in 38 studies. Most of them were individual worker-focused intervention and CBT was most frequently conducted. There
were wide variations in duration, and intervals of SMIs.
Conclusions: These results of this study will be used to guide the development of SMIs. And it was needed to identify and debate on ‘stress’ terms among the authors and to develop the SMIs. Also, it will be needed research that evaluate the effect of Job SMIs and experimental studies must be conducted rather than descriptive studies.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
직무스트레스관리중재, 근로자, 직무스트레스
Job stress management interventions(SMIs), Worker, Job stress
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|